Readiness assessment for CSOs

Key stakeholders have to appreciate and understand the individual, organizational, and institutional changes that participatory audit may bring. Jumping into the engagement without assessing readiness may have an effect in two areas. First, if both the SAI and CSOs are unprepared, this engagement may result in a waste of human and financial resources and missed opportunities. Second, because this activity requires scale within the SAI, groups of people may exist who, without the requisite buy-in, may block or stall reform initiatives, rendering them ineffective. Readiness assessments can provide a preliminary idea of the risks and challenges and the general condition of an institution’s openness to engage with the SAI.


Before working with SAIs, CSOs must be able to answer some fundamental questions. Given the different structure and mandate of SAIs, CSOs may have to design a different approach from to their engagement strategies with other government agencies. For instance, the strict accounting and auditing rules that SAIs employ demand discretion and nondisclosure from their citizen partners during the audit process. Concerns such as these may become deal makers or deal breakers when determining whether the CSO–SAI partnership is feasible. The guide that follows provides a few diagnostic questions to help CSOs determine whether they are ready to engage with a SAI.

In order to undertake this self-assessment, check the following key areas -which are briefly defined and exemplified-, and answer the questions below each section: a. Appreciation of the context of SAI-CSO engagement, b. Institutional Capacity to Engage with the SAI, c. Track Record, and d. Resources.

Bear in mind that answers are displayed in different colors, similar to a traffic light. This means that green entails a positive response (“yes”, “always”, “a lot”, “I strongly agree”) while red means a negative answer (“no”, “never”, “very little/few”, “I disagree”). Between these ends, the yellow color accounts for “somehow”, “sometimes”, “maybe”.

Once you´ve answered all the questions, check your results and find out how ready you are to start up citizen with the SAI.

If you are citizen or CSO representative interested in working jointly with the oversight agency, try answering the outlined questions and check if you are ready to engage.

Start test

Any comments? Please notify us here.


TPA Initiative – ACIJ (2011): “Diagnostic Report on Transparency, Citizen Participation and Accountability in Supreme Audit Institutions of Latin America”

TPA Initiative – ACIJ (2013): “Audit Institutions in Latin America. Transparency, Citizen Participation and Accountability Indicators”.

Cornejo, C., Guillan, A. & Lavin, R. (2013): “When Supreme Audit Institutions engage with civil society: Exploring lessons from the Latin American Transparency Participation and Accountability Initiative”, U4 Practice Insight Nº5, Bergen, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre - Chr. Michelsen Institute.

O´Donnell, Guillermo (2001): “Horizontal. Accountability: The legal institutionalization of mistrust”, Buenos Aires, PostdataN°6, pp. 11-34.

OECD (2013): “Citizen Engagement and Supreme Audit Institutions” (Stocktaking Report: DRAFT).

UN (2013): “Citizen Engagement Practicesby Supreme Audit Institutions”, Compendium of Innovative Practices of Citizen Engagementby Supreme Audit Institutions for Public Accountability.

INTOSAI (2013): “The Value and Benefits of Supreme Audit Institutions – making a difference to the lives of citizens”,ISSAI 12.

INTOSAI (2013): “Beijing Declaration”.

OLACEFS (2013): “The Santiago Declaration”.

INTOSAI (2010):“Principles of transparency and accountability”,ISSAI 20.

INTOSAI (2010):“Principles of Transparency and Accountability - Principles and Good Practices”, ISSAI 21.

INTOSAI (2007): “The Mexico Declaration on SAI Independence“, ISSAI 10.

OLACEFS (2009): “Asuncion Declaration”.

INTOSAI (1977): “Lima Declaration”.

UN (2011): Resolution A/66/209 “Promoting the efficiency, accountability, effectiveness and transparency of public administration bystrengthening supreme audit institutions”.

UN (2003): “United Nations Convention against Corruption”.